...60 days of the State’s Attorney discovering the violation. Any citizen may bring suit within 60 days of the meeting in question, but not after. The “60 days after a...
...not expressly authorized, we could go on for days, but I think you get the idea. What is expressly authorized is “reasonable expenses”, which could be up for interpretation, however,...
...days before the conference? Or page 125 where she expenses a Chamber Luncheon on 11/19/12. What really happen at the Chamber on that day? Or was this actually an expense...
...be at the September meeting to find out. Sixty days is more than enough time to figure out you need to resign due to conflicts of interest. It is entirely...
...60 days to fill the vacancy. May I suggest the entire department rally behind a reformer that will put a stop to what has clearly been an embarrassment to the...
...a commercial requester category and claim they have 21 days to provide the records. Wrong. The Freedom of Information Act does not require a requester to “prove” anything. It does...
...board meeting four years ago, and the only person with power to prosecute is a County State’s Attorney, who must do so within 60 days of his discovery of the...
...days after being exposed of his illegaly holding office. Not sure why Orrico wasted his time with a resignation letter as the law outlined he was no longer a trustee...
...why the OPPL was refusing to produce certain documents. The Board members would refuse to answer or explain, but some would promise to “look into it”. A few days later,...
...would adjourn the meeting without discussing the Yargus papers. The AG’s PAC has demanded the Board respond to the allegations about the July 11th meeting within seven days. This brings...
