...be at the September meeting to find out. Sixty days is more than enough time to figure out you need to resign due to conflicts of interest. It is entirely...
...60 days to fill the vacancy. May I suggest the entire department rally behind a reformer that will put a stop to what has clearly been an embarrassment to the...
...a commercial requester category and claim they have 21 days to provide the records. Wrong. The Freedom of Information Act does not require a requester to “prove” anything. It does...
...board meeting four years ago, and the only person with power to prosecute is a County State’s Attorney, who must do so within 60 days of his discovery of the...
...days after being exposed of his illegaly holding office. Not sure why Orrico wasted his time with a resignation letter as the law outlined he was no longer a trustee...
...why the OPPL was refusing to produce certain documents. The Board members would refuse to answer or explain, but some would promise to “look into it”. A few days later,...
...would adjourn the meeting without discussing the Yargus papers. The AG’s PAC has demanded the Board respond to the allegations about the July 11th meeting within seven days. This brings...
...Act specifically states the records shall be “provided”, not shall be “provided after payment of postage”, to the requester within five days. The AG has ruled on that specific issue...
...this story. As outlined in that article, the Illinois Open Meetings Act allows the DuPage County State’s Attorney, Bob Berlin, to take action and prosecute such violations within 60 days...
...Murphy. The Illinois Attorney General’s Public Access Counselor’s Office has sent two more letters to the park district demanding that they answer the Complaints within seven days. This puts them...