Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved.

April 18, 2024

Highway Meeting CANCELLED, Conflicts Grow?

By Kirk Allen & John Kraft

On February 7, 2013


In yet another strange twist of events we found out today that the Edgar County Highway Meeting scheduled for Monday morning at 9 am has been cancelled.

I was advised by a board member that Chris Patrick called them last night and said he had spoken with Aaron Lawson, County Highway Engineer, and that he (Aaron) didn’t have anything for them so he cancelled the meeting.

It wasn’t clear who “he” is that actually cancelled the meeting, Lawson or Patrick?   A county board member can’t just up and cancel a meeting on their own, and I know in the past Ben Jenness has made it clear the highway engineer doesn’t have the power to cancel it either, so the question now is, who cancelled the meeting and the bigger question, why?

Why because we know the state has put their foot down and demanded the issue of Chris Patrick and his Conflict of Interest be resolved, which so far is being ignored by just about every board member as well as the State’s Attorney.

We are awaiting on a copy of a letter that Craig Smith sent IDOT regarding his client’s situation.  The client?  Chris Patrick!

So how is it that a private attorney is asking IDOT questions pertaining to an elected official?  If there were questions needing clarified why didn’t the State’s Attorney send those questions?

Is it possible that Mark Isaf already KNOWS there is a conflict of interest and has advised Chris Patrick to get a lawyer?  We don’t know for sure but we find it very odd that a State’s Attorney is sitting on the sideline on this matter and not taking a leadership role to resolve a conflict of interest that even law professors in other parts of the state see as a blatant disregard for the law, as does the Office of Chief Counsel for IDOT!

Knowing there are at least 20 families that are facing lay-offs if this matter is not resolved does anyone else find it strange that there is not going to be a highway meeting?  I don’t think one of these meetings have ever been cancelled in the 2+ years I have been covering county issues?


Did Chris Patrick get his feelings hurt because every board member spoke out against him during the last highway meeting?

Does he think by not having that meeting he somehow is in compliance with his fabricated position that not being at a meeting somehow changes the law?

Only time will tell but we must ask, how long will we continue to kick the can and keep so many people on the edge not knowing if their next paycheck is their last?

There appears to still be a scheduled County Board study session at 9:30 am  on Monday the 11th of this month.  Knowing over a million dollars of Tarp money is in jeopardy thanks to Chris Patrick and his actions, it should prove to be an interesting meeting considering he is not suppose to be involved in any discussions about those matters.

I plan on raising issues pertaining to the expenditure of $82,218.00 related to Land Acquisition Engineering Project Fees for Cheatham, Tucker, Patrick and Dyer parcels at the airport.

For those that didn’t know, Chris Patrick is currently shown as the owner of two properties connected to the Airport that appear to be part of a long term expansion plan.  Isn’t that convenient for Chris Patrick?  Sit as Chairman of the Airport for 25 years and be a part of all the expansion plans giving him first hand knowledge of all future projects, and then end up acquiring land that will be part of that expansion.  Boy how things are coming together!

And as if that is not troubling enough, the Edgar County Airport, which was under the command and control of  Chris “Napoleon” Patrick all of 2012 should be proud to see they came in OVER budget!

I wonder if the “office clerical” might have had anything to do with that?  You know, that office worker that Chris Patrick is apparently living with!

I wonder how he comprehends that portion of the statute that outlines “no person holding office may be in ANY MANNER financially interested directly in his own name or indirectly in the name of any other person” and how it relates to his relationship he has with Lisa Gill?

  • She was hired under his Chairmanship of the airport
  • It’s reported that they live together
  • She draws a paycheck from the Airport funds with approval of the board, which he is Chairman

So the question:

Is he indirectly, in the name of another person, financially interested in any manner that he is called to act or vote on?

Most with a 5th grade reading comprehension would agree the answer to that question is YES! 

You truly can’t make this stuff up!



Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print


  • Curious
    Posted at 18:26h, 07 February

    Is that any different than Timmy the ex-sheriff voting on pay raises and perks for the 911 coordinator he was shacking up with? Its Edgar County. According to all the Elected officials we should all just sit down and STFU so they can get on with gettin it on.

    • jmkraft
      Posted at 21:42h, 07 February

      No difference at all…

  • Del
    Posted at 18:55h, 07 February

    Question. Who is paying for Patricks attorney?

    • jmkraft
      Posted at 21:41h, 07 February

      I believe Chris is paying for his own attorney.

  • Kirk Allen
    Posted at 21:46h, 07 February

    Glad to see great questions and comparisons!

  • Sandy Gray
    Posted at 07:39h, 08 February

    My question, Isaf knows all of this BS is wrong, when his he going to get the balls to get rid of Patrick, my understanding is that the board can’t do it. Doesn’t he realise that there is an election coming up again one of these days? He could very well lose his nice paying job.

    • jmkraft
      Posted at 07:59h, 08 February

      He has the lawfull authority to choose what to prosecute and what not to prosecute. Similar to dragging an 18 year old from Vermillion thru the court system for almost 2 years to get him found guilty of driving without a license – then his office turns around and dismisses a speeding ticket issued to Congressman Tim Johnson. I see lots of “equal justice” in those 2 cases…LOL…

  • Sandy Richey Hissem
    Posted at 10:57h, 08 February

    Sandy Richey Hissem liked this on Facebook.

  • Extra Curious
    Posted at 18:46h, 08 February

    How much does Mark Isaf make and what are his benefits? Also what benefits do the county board members have?

  • Kirk Allen
    Posted at 19:48h, 08 February


    2012 Edgar County Isaf Mark R $128,958.96

    I suspect he also has full health benefits as well.

  • Paul Harden
    Posted at 20:04h, 08 February

    Is there no way to force Mr. Isaf to follow up on any of this ?