McHenry Co. (ECWd) –
How can tax money be spent by public officials? It starts with our State Constitution.
- Public Funds, Property, and Credit can only be used for public purpose.
- Obligations for payment or making payments from public funds are only as authorized by law or ordinance (Article VIII Section 1 of Illinois Constitution)
With those two key points in mind, you have to identify the law that authorized the expenditure, unless the public body is a Home Rule entity and then the expenditure is by ordinance.
Algonquin Township is not Home Rule. That means their spending must be only as authorized by law and within the confines of our State Constitution.
Which brings us to the key question people should ask with all spending by local government, in this case, let’s focus on gifts.
Where in the law does it authorize gifts to be purchased, for any reason?
This would include birthdays, anniversaries, Christmas, and even retirements. Where so many people go off the reservation is they focus on how they feel about the spending instead of its legality. We can all come up with a justification for spending, but the key is ensuring that justification meets the legal requirement of being authorized.
I don’t know too many people that are against birthday parties, Christmas parties, or even giving a person a $200 watch after 39 years of service. However, it appears there are a lot of people that think it’s proper to use tax levy money, taken from the people for a specific purpose, in this case, Road Maintenance, and use it for something other than what you told them when you taxed them.
There is no law permitting the purchase of gifts with taxpayer money. It appears the legislature went the extra mile to make sure everyone knew the rules on gifts as it is part of the State Ethics laws, applicable to local government.
“Gift” means any gratuity, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other tangible or intangible item having monetary value including, but not limited to, cash, food and drink, and honoraria for speaking engagements related to or attributable to government employment or the official position of an employee, member, or officer. The value of a gift may be further defined by rules adopted by the appropriate ethics commission or by the Auditor General for the Auditor General and for employees of the office of the Auditor General.
Of special interest, the wording in the exceptions to the Gift Ban.
(5 ILCS 430/10-15) Gift ban; exceptions. The restriction in Section 10-10 does not apply to the following:
(1) Opportunities, benefits, and services that are available on the same conditions as for the general public.
So does the general public, on the same conditions as a retiring employee, have the same opportunities, benefits, and services available to them? Does the general public, on the same conditions get to eat from the trough at a Christmas party paid for with public funds? Does the general public, on the same conditions, get a $200.00 taxpayer funded watch when they retire from their private employment?
The answer is simple, No.
There is no public purpose to spending money on gifts for retired employees. If you want to give a gift, pull out your own wallet or purse and spend your own money!
We contend, Bob Miller’s purchase of a $200 Watch as a gift did not serve a public purpose. No matter if it was for Retirement, Christmas, Birthday or any other reason. It benefited one person, the recipient!
Public funds are to be used only for public purpose!
Our work is funded entirely thru donations and we
ask that you consider donating at the below link.
Watching TownshipsPosted at 19:16h, 22 May
So was the gift for himself? Again I say where were trustees and supervisors heads. Up the wrong hole obviously! They need to be indicted right along with Mr Miller and his wife. This gives every good township a bad name and greatly infuriates me.
Kirk AllenPosted at 19:25h, 22 May
No, we understand the gift was for a retired employee.
CindyPosted at 00:41h, 23 May
As we are learning, the whole dynasty family and most of their employees were grifters. Sadly, the people that elected these folks trusted them to be honest upright people of integrity. Boy, we were ever wrong! A blind law student could indict these criminals with what Kirk and friends have uncovered.