Logan Co. (ECWd) –
We attended the Mount Pulaski City council meeting Tuesday night and addressed what appear to be clear violations of law by the Mayor, James Cole.
What was most surprising to us, not to imply the Mayor signing a contract with his union without board approval is not surprising, was the volume of alleged criminal conduct raised during the meeting and the attorney sitting silently the whole time.
His silence didn’t last past the next morning.
“After serious consideration, we do not believe our firm can provide effective legal representation to the City of Mt. Pulaski moving forward.
This is not a decision we take lightly, but based on the current state of affairs at the City, the potential and current conflicts of interest prevent us from effectively representing the City.
Effective immediately, our firm’s representation of the City of Mt. Pulaski is hereby terminated. I strongly suggest the City seek out different legal representation.”
This development is significant. We contend this attorney may be a material witness to possible criminal conduct and violations of municipal ordinances if he attended all their meetings. We have reports that matters taken to him resulted in a claim of “there’s nothing you can do because he has not broken the law”. If that representation is correct, I would say the city council blew that out of the water with their raised concerns about the Mayor’s actions.
- Signing $10,000.00 check without any board approval
- Signing Contract with the Union that he works for, all without board approval.
- Issuing work order to have the city make repairs to property in front of his home.
- Signing credit card contract without board approval.
- Owing a debt to the city.
We contend the Mayor has a very big problem as the language in the contract he signed points directly to necessary authority. He DID NOT have that authority to sign the contract in question yet represented that he did. That action may well constitute forgery under Illinois Criminal law.
Necessary Authority. The Employer and the Employer’s agent signing on behalf of the Employer represent and warrant that (a) the Employer’s agent identified below has full power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement; (b) this Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered on behalf of the Employer; and (c) this Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the parties hereto which is enforceable against the parties in accordance with its terms. (Download contract here)
The city ordinances are very clear when it comes to a liability to the city and expenditure or appropriation of money. Such action is required to be passed by the city council and this one was not.
1-6-4: ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS
A. Approval; Veto: All resolutions and motions: 1) which create any liability against the city; or 2) which provide for the expenditure or appropriation of its money; or 3) to sell any city school property, and all ordinances, passed by the city council shall be deposited with the city clerk. If the mayor approves of them, he shall sign them. Those of which he disapproves, he shall return to the city council, with his written objections, at the next regular meeting of the city council occurring not less than five (5) days after their passage. The mayor may disapprove of any one or more sums appropriated in any ordinance, resolution or motion making an appropriation, and if so, the remainder shall be effective. However, the mayor may disapprove entirely of an ordinance, resolution or motion making an appropriation. If the mayor fails to return any ordinance or any specified resolution or motion with his written objections within the designated time, it shall become effective despite the absence of his signature. (1967 Code § 2.105; amd. 2010 Code)
After this violation and others were was raised during the meeting it would appear the City Attorney saw the writing on the wall.
We urge the city council to gather all the evidence that points to a violation of the law and file a formal criminal complaint with the County Sheriff’s office or Illinois State Police.
As the video will reflect, we urged the Mayor to resign immediately as did members of the council later in the meeting.
Our work is funded entirely thru donations and we
ask that you consider donating at the below link.
David SpannPosted at 20:31h, 29 March
it becomes very clear that Roberts rule of order has not been followed, or that they are not following a certain set procedures on how to run a meeting , I wish all involved the best of luck in getting things resolved. also just a note on legal council, it would be my belief that he or they should advise this council on all aspects of a no confidence vote and how best to proceed from that. Thank you to all for being civil at your meeting, these items of discussion are never easy and I believe that the open communication between all is a direct key to keep moving forward as a progressive town.
Atlanta TaxpayerPosted at 07:32h, 30 March
If only the city of Lincoln and Atlanta could be lucky enough to have this attorney resign. Oh the stories that could be written!
The SkunkPosted at 08:34h, 30 March
Yes! So was he heads deep in his cell phone! In Atlanta he gave away our public swimming pool for a mere $3,500 and then his firm advised our council to approve A BLANK ordinance with no content in it to give the mayor power to sign a quit claim deed! That is just for starters and it is all on video! And I bet we had to pay him to fix HIS mistake.
Lincoln people now is your chance to share his infamous behavior at your council meetings.
J. R. FordPosted at 23:37h, 30 March
The city attorney never said a word during the meeting. The city should sue for lack of representation.