Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved.

November 22, 2024

Plainfield Fire Protection District Trustee Mark Reynolds' Conflict Of Interest –

By John Kraft & Kirk Allen

On December 13, 2015

Plainfield, IL. (ECWd) –
While Trustee Mark Reynolds was on the Plainfield Fire Protection District Board, he engaged in a Conflict of Interest when he “abstained” from voting to create the new position of assistant chief, and then later participated in the vote to hire himself into the newly created position. Additionally, after being appointed as an Asst Chief, he entered into closed session as Trustee to discuss personnel issues and other items.
Section 4, of the Fire Protection District Act states:

<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">(70 ILCS 705/4)</span> <span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">(from Ch. 127 1/2, par. 24)</span>
    <span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">Sec. 4. </span><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">Trustees; conflict of interest; violations.</span>

<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">No trustee</span> or employee of such district shall be <span style="text-decoration: underline;">directly or indirectly</span> interested financially in any contract work or business or the sale of any article, the expense, price or consideration of which is paid by the district; </span>

<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">(e) Any officer or employee who violates this Section is guilty of a Class 4 felony and in addition thereto any office held by such person so convicted shall become vacant and shall be so declared as part of the judgment of the court.</span>

The FPDA does provide for certain exceptions, but none of them qualify for this situation.

During the July 29, 2015 Special Meeting, Trustee Barnes stated that during closed session, discussion was held with regard to personnel issues and the union negotiation progress.

“Trustee Shreve made a motion to authorize Chief Riddle to appoint a part-time Assistant Chief position, seconded by Trustee Paul. A roll call vote was taken as follows: Trustee Lehmann – yes, Trustee Shreve – yes, Trustee Barnes – yes, Trustee Reynolds – abstain, Trustee Paul – yes. Motion carried.”

During the August 11th, 2015 meeting, Reynolds appointed as Asst Chief. Reynolds abstained.

Chief Riddle announced the part-time Assistant Chief has been chosen; it is Mark Reynolds. After a brief discussion, a motion was made by Trustee Shreve to approve the appointment of Mark Reynolds as the part-time Assistant Chief, seconded by Trustee Paul. A roll call vote was taken as follows: Trustee Lehmann – yes; Trustee Shreve – yes; Trustee Barnes –yes; Trustee Reynolds – abstained; Trustee Paul – yes. Motion carried.”

It should also be noted that Reynolds, after being “appointed” as assistant chief, entered into the executive session with the board, still acting as board trustee – another conflict.

During the Sept 8th meeting, the minutes show Reynolds is still on the board after having been appointed to Assistant Chief.

A roll call attendance was taken as follows: Trustee James Lehmann – present; Trustee Douglas Shreve – present; Trustee William Barnes – present; Trustee Tom Paul – present. Trustee Mark Reynolds was absent.

Chief Riddle appointed Mark Reynolds as Assistant Chief effective of September 1, 2015. A swearing in ceremony is forthcoming.

President Barnes accepted the resignation from Mark Reynolds as a Trustee on the Board. A notice will be sent out stating we will be interviewing for a replacement Trustee. All interested parties need their letter of interest in by October 1, 2015.

At the Sept 11th special meeting. Reynolds now acting as assistant chief.

What happened here, is that Trustee Reynolds actually participated in the discussion and vote to create the Assistant Fire Chief position, and later participated in the vote, in violation of the Fire Protection District Act, to appoint himself to the earlier created position, a Class 4 felony [if prosecuted].  An abstention is in fact a vote and carries with the majority, thus he clearly participated in the vote that benefited him directly (Prosser v. Village of Fox Lake).
Presentation1
 
 

SHARE THIS

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

RELATED

1 Comment
  • Not_Backing_Down
    Posted at 09:27h, 17 December

    You should also investigate the illegal TIF meetings the village is having with the Fire Department(and the 7 other taxing bodies they claim support their TIF plan). Twice now, the village has claimed in news reports they have complete support for a new TIF district.
    Specifically, the village is claiming the Fire Department supports their TIF plan, but no joint review boards have ever been formed where such a discussion could have legally taken place.
    When these other 7 departments are asked, not a single one of them has any documentation of these meetings taking place, or who attended them.
    http://plainfield.foich.org/jurisdiction/fire_dept_plainfield.html

$