Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved.

November 22, 2024

City of DeKalb writes its own Open Meetings Laws –

By John Kraft & Kirk Allen

On April 14, 2015

DeKalb, IL. (ECWd) –

The City of DeKalb thinks they are special and that they are the only public body in the state that can prohibit public comment, because they wrote their own version of the Open Meetings Act that only applies to them…because they said so.

Illinois Open Meetings Act and the Public’s Right to Speak

<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">Sec. 2.06. </span><span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">Minutes; right to speak.</span>

<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">(g) Any person shall be permitted an opportunity to address public officials under the rules established and recorded by the public body.</span>

We all know that a meeting is defined as any gathering of a majority of a quorum of a public body (or of a committee) is a public meeting and the Open Meetings Act applies in its entirety.

So I went looking for any language in the OMA that said the City of DeKalb could make its own version to prohibit public comments at its meetings. I found no such provision in the OMA.

City of DeKalb’s unlawful version of Public Comment

The City of DeKalb’s website listing its City Code has a section dedicated to meetings and their rules established for public comment.

Under DeKalb city code section 2.06 they place restrictions and prohibitions on public comments during its “Committee of the Whole” meetings:

<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">2.06 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETINGS.</span>
<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">c) The intent and purpose of the Committee of the Whole meetings shall be primarily for the purpose of discussion of consideration items brought before the Council and various matters which require a presentation and/or upon which discussion is anticipated, but not for the passage of Ordinances or Resolutions. <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Public comments shall generally not be permitted at such meetings</strong></span>, but rather shall be reserved for the City Council meeting immediately following such meetings. <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The Committee of the Whole meeting shall be treated as a meeting where public comment is not permitted under Section 2.12(ad) of this Code. (13-51)</strong></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">The intent and purpose of Committee of the Whole Meetings shall be primarily for discussion of consideration items brought before the Council and various matters which require a presentation and/or upon which discussion is anticipated, but not for the passage of Ordinances or Resolutions. <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong> No public comments shall be entertained at such Committee of the Whole Meetings. (91-98)</strong></span></span>

Wow. How sweet is that!? So here we have a city council that thinks it is special enough to be able to just throw the OMA out the window and dictate that people cannot speak at one of its public meetings.

If that wasn’t enough, the city also codified other meetings where public comment “is not permitted” – and they think they can do this at any time:

<span style="font-family: Courier New; font-size: small;">3. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Public Comment Not Permitted</span>: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The City reserves the right to conduct public meetings at which public comment is not received, when the chair of the meeting determines that it is necessary to do so in order to provide for orderly and efficient governance.</span> Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless the City is responding to an actual emergency or is otherwise permitted by law to act in such a fashion, as determined by the chair, the City shall not take final action on any item of public business when the sole discussion of such item has been at a meeting where public comment was not permitted. (12-90)</span>

They could not be anymore wrong than what they have put to writing.

The City of DeKalb does not have the authority to prohibit public comment at any of its meetings, and they do not have the authority to develop rules or ordinances that prohibit public comment at its meetings.

 **See pages 4 and 10 of Section 2 of DeKalb’s City Code (HERE).
image name

SHARE THIS

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

RELATED

8 Comments
  • Peggy
    Posted at 09:56h, 16 April

    And the people who were elected to represent the taxpayers are OK with that? Where is the outcry from the citizens? When local government is allowed to write their own rules open and honest government is gone.

  • joesteals
    Posted at 16:28h, 15 April

    City of DeKalb writes its own Open Meetings Laws – http://t.co/AcxZPnUgrj

  • Dan Smith
    Posted at 12:05h, 15 April

    not that I’m defending them, but I know the Village of Glen Ellyn has workshop meetings of the whole and I do not believe their meeting minutes reflect any public participation.

  • Warren J. Le Fever
    Posted at 10:06h, 15 April

    What some citizens need to do is video plus sound any attempt to refuse public comment at a meeting and be prepared take whatever necessary legal actions they need to restore the right of public comments to the citizens. Such arrogant and abhorrent behavior needs quashed as soon as possible. If those officials can’t handle the heat, they should resign.

  • Dave
    Posted at 09:59h, 15 April

    Who knew state law was subservient to city ordinances… LOL Unbelievable!

  • mhammett
    Posted at 07:15h, 15 April

    City of DeKalb writes its own Open Meetings Laws – http://t.co/0fQ7gjLnip via @ECWDogs

  • citybarb60115
    Posted at 04:52h, 15 April

    Edgar County Watchdogs: City of DeKalb writes its own Open Meetings Laws – http://t.co/ASnVLRzR8k

  • ECWDogs
    Posted at 20:21h, 14 April

    City of DeKalb writes its own Open Meetings Laws – http://t.co/FKSBQ8gjhH

$