...from a meeting held last June, which we believe proves their intention was to set compensation at the appropriate time according to the Local Government Officer Compensation Act, but leave...
...to the acts giving rise to potential claims? Most filings of this type would point to actual claims in support of their filing rather than say the acts give rise...
...should have decided it – especially since we sued the COD under FOIA and lost, mainly because COD’s defense used that now-invalid opinion as part of their defense. My assertions...
...the one paying the insurance, fuel, and maintenance. The fact is, the only alleged benefit that was withdrawn was the billing for the phone which actually was not a benefit...
...to the board. I asked for his work product and all that was produced was reports from 2019. Since there are no reports provided as requested we can assume there...
...the final report, the salt given away was salt that was ordered by the Road District. However, Miller claims the salt was given to the Road District, which means it...
...as redactions, should the recording be released or ordered to be released but such redactions are under the control of the public body, not the attorney. In this particular recording,...
...we alleged this meeting was in violation of the Open Meetings Act because the stated reason for closed session was to discuss Road District personnel. Those personnel belong to the...
...a reasonable doubt is because “the purchase was explicitly authorized and approved by the Township Board.” Now if that were actually true, that the board did as was claimed, I...
...of sick leave was eliminated in 1995? Nevermind the fact what happened in 1995 has nothing to do with a policy that was in place in 1993, so why mention...
