Nason, Ill. (ECWd) –
We had the pleasure of attending a special meeting of the City of Nason, Illinois, last night.
Nason is a small city located in Jefferson County, with a population of around 200 people.
We attended this meeting because we came across a video of the Mayor of Nason, Michelle L. McKinney, basically threatening residents and having them removed from meetings because they were video recording the open public meeting.
There was a request for review sent to the Illinois Attorney General’s Public Access Counselor filed by one of the victims, alleging violations of the Open Meetings Act.
Mayor McKinney insisted the meeting ordinance came from the Illinois Municipal League, but I told her they would never have “approved” of any meeting ordinance with these provisions in them.
Just because you can make rules, doesn’t mean you can make any rules you want to make – any rules must enhance the public’s right to speak, not restrict that right.
Here are some of the most offensive items listed in the city’s public meeting ordinance:
- Must signup in advance and give your name, address, and subject of public comment
- Must give notice in writing, or by phone, at least 72 hours in advance of a meeting if you intend on recording or livestreaming the meeting
- Violations incur a fine of between $150 and $500 if the Mayor says you were disrupting the meeting, and summarily ejected from said meeting
- Mayor can limit the number of persons speaking on a specific topic
When questioned during public comment, Mayor McKinney stated that the ordinance would be amended to remove the city’s requirement of a 72 hour notice for video recording meetings.
During the meeting, she engaged in dialog with some residents, then when it appeared to us that she was beginning to lose the debate, she shut them down and told them they were disrupting the meeting, even asking the Sheriff’s Deputy (twice) to remove a resident from the meeting. The resident was not removed.
Additionally, Kirk spoke during public comment referencing the public comment policy, then I spoke. When I started speaking the Mayor told me that I could not talk about the public comment policy because Kirk had already talked about it. I continued talking, and she insisted I was disrupting the meeting, and had the secretary write my name down to be issued a fine. I volunteered my name and address because the fine is not lawful, there was no meeting disruption, and I doubt the Mayor will follow through with issuing any fines – I beleive she uses that as an intimidation tactic against the resident.
Watch the video below, more information will be forthcoming about the City of Nason.
We apologize for the quality of the audio, sometimes there is substantial static, but you can still hear most of what is being said.
4 Comments
ROBERT O. BOGUE
Posted at 14:37h, 02 NovemberDoes she know there are places like Russia or China,
where leaders can legitimately tell citizens to be quiet, to pay fines and worse? It seems, she needs a new country if she’s hoping to fit in, because that stuff just doesn’t work here in the USA.
Free speech doesn’t mean the Mayor, can interrupt, haze, badger, question or make her own rules to silence something she doesn’t like in Public Session.
Sgt. Joe Friday (LAPD Ret)
Posted at 15:15h, 01 NovemberI was waiting for Boss Hogg to make an appearance.
Brian K Anderson
Posted at 08:33h, 01 NovemberSounds like a Mahomet Township monthly meeting that the ECWDs attended where they attempted to institute a “public comment” resolution. Best quote ever by John Kraft, “who are you, the language police?”
Dave
Posted at 06:48h, 01 NovemberGood grief….. more proof, power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts….. absolutely