Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved.

November 22, 2024

Peru, IL. Police Chief cites nonexistant state law; OK’s illegal use of public vehicle –

By John Kraft & Kirk Allen

On February 17, 2018

PERU, IL. (ECWd) –

When a concerned citizen filed a report with the Peru, Illinois Police Department regarding what she believed to be official misconduct; illegal use of a fire department vehicle to snowplow a private driveway, the Peru Police Chief sent her a message saying no law was broken.

This is a situation where a Peru, Illinois Fireman, Blake Frund, drove to the fire department, obtained the FD truck, and used it to plow the snow out of his personal driveway – Clearly a personal use of public property.

In his letter, Police Chief Bernabei states “the Peru Fire Department has had a long and sanctioned departmental practice in place that fire fighters are permitted the use of a department pickup truck and plow to clear their personal driveways during or after significant snow events. . . The practice is clearly legal under Illinois law as the use of the plow and truck was an authorized act under Illinois law as well as public policy and practice.”

Really?

Here is an Illinois law in the form of Article VIII Section 1 of the Illinois Constitution:
(a) Public funds, property or credit shall be used only for public purposes. (b) The State, units of local government and school districts shall incur obligations for payment or make payments from public funds only as authorized by law or ordinance. (c) Reports and records of the obligation, receipt and use of public funds of the State, units of local government and school districts are public records available for inspection by the public according to law.

The Constitution, or Supreme Law of the Land, says it is not an authorized practice. There is nothing I could find in the City of Peru’s online Ordinance book which authorized that use of a public vehicle, and historical practice is not an excuse. Even if it was in city policy, it would still be a violation of law because a local government cannot pass rules which conflict with state or federal laws.

Using the fire department truck in this fashion serves no public purpose and constitutes use of public property for something having no public purpose, and in turn, violating the Illinois Constitution.

In an interview with mywebtimes.com, another local Fire Chief stated their firemen clean their own driveways out just like all the other people and that in his 30 years of experience, never once could he remember an instance of his firemen using public equipment to snowplow their private driveways.

I find it quite telling that Police Chief Bernabei cites “State law” in his letter, but never cites a specific state law – maybe because it does not exist…

PeruPD-Letter1

Peru FD truck after plowing private drive

.
Our work is funded entirely thru donations and we
ask that you consider donating at the below link.

SHARE THIS

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

RELATED

6 Comments
  • John
    Posted at 08:49h, 22 February

    And if your house was burning down and firefighters took too long to get there to save your family you would complain about that as well

    • jmkraft
      Posted at 08:56h, 22 February

      and if your house burned down because a firefighter had the only fire department vehicle with a snowplow in another county clearing out his own private drive instead of clearing the route to your house, you would complain about it.

  • Stan
    Posted at 09:13h, 18 February

    The Chief needs to proofread things that go out over his signature. Or have someone else do it. How embarrassing is it for a high profile public official to send something that contains several grammatical errors? No standards of professionalism? No pride?

  • Janic
    Posted at 19:34h, 17 February

    That attorney is not going to have many clients after this. What an idiot !!!

  • MdStine
    Posted at 10:21h, 17 February

    Perhaps a new amendment to all Public Sector payment recipients from the most entry level to the Presidency. When violating the law is found regardless if they did not know or understand, any and all pension is forfeited and the cost to defend their actions is solely their expense not that of the taxpayers that they violated for their gain.

  • Tom Stevens
    Posted at 09:34h, 17 February

    Disappointed in the Chiefs response and this should require immediate termination of the employee from any city position as this is a violation of state law clearly the city is caught with its pants down

$