Dolton, Ill. (ECWd) –
On February 9, 2024, the Illinois Attorney General’s Public Access Counselor (“PAC”) issued a rare Binding Opinion directing the Village of Dolton to respond to FOIA requests.
On November 29, 2023, Investigative Reporter Andrew Schroedter, WGN-TV, asked the village of Dolton to provide copies of various public records, including those related to payments made to Tiffany Henyard, leases for Henyard’s village vehicle, and credit card statements.
After receiving no response from the village (it is routine for Dolton to not respond), he asked the AG’s PAC to review the FOIA denial and render an opinion.
The village refused to respond to the AG’s inquiry.
“Therefore, it is the opinion of the Attorney General that the Village of Dolton has violated section 3(d) of FOIA by failing, within the statutory time for responding to Mr. Schroedter’s November 29, 2023, FOIA request, to provide copies of the requested records or to deny the request in writing in whole or in part. Accordingly, the Village is hereby directed to take immediate and appropriate action to comply with this opinion by providing Mr. Schroedter with copies of all records responsive to each part of the November 29, 2023 , request, subject only to permissible redactions, if any . . .“
The AG’s Binding Opinion #24-002 is below:
24-002
8 Comments
Michael Hagberg
Posted at 10:16h, 07 July(j) If the court determines that a public body willfully and intentionally failed to comply with this Act, or otherwise acted in bad faith, the court shall also impose upon the public body a civil penalty of not less than $2,500 nor more than $5,000 for each occurrence. In assessing the civil penalty, the court shall consider in aggravation or mitigation the budget of the public body and whether the public body has previously been assessed penalties for violations of this Act. The court may impose an additional penalty of up to $1,000 for each day the violation continues if:
(1) the public body fails to comply with the court’s
order after 30 days;
(2) the court’s order is not on appeal or stayed; and
(3) the court does not grant the public body
additional time to comply with the court’s order to disclose public records.
Waterman
Posted at 17:34h, 14 FebruaryBut how many times has a suit been filed for noncompliance of a binding opinion? And what is the penalty?
Brian K Anderson
Posted at 08:45h, 14 FebruaryWhat is the purpose of a binding opinion? I have received favorable findings through several RFRs, none of them state they are a “binding opinion”. Basically they are all slaps on the wrist, no true penalty or consequence. Maybe the AG should attach monetary fines for violations of FOIA law to encourage pro-active instead of reactive efforts in accomplishing accountabilty and transparency by government.
John Kraft & Kirk Allen
Posted at 08:53h, 14 Februaryfor noncompliance of a binding opinion, the AG can file suit against the public body
Paul Kane
Posted at 19:07h, 14 FebruaryIt could be that the AG can file suit against the public body for noncompliance, but 5 ILCS 140/11.6 indicates otherwise.
https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/000501400K11.6.htm#:~:text=%285%20ILCS%20140%2F11.6%29%20Sec.%2011.6.%20Noncompliance%20with%20binding,purposes%20of%20subsection%20%28j%29%20of%20Section%2011%20if%3A
Dave
Posted at 11:10h, 13 FebruaryWhen you hide public records, that speaks volumes
Dave
Posted at 11:09h, 13 FebruarySomeone needs to go to jail for willfully disobeying the law
Waterman
Posted at 10:52h, 13 FebruaryWhat’s the penalty for not providing the information? It looks like they can stall as long as they want in hopes that it will be forgotten