I am more concerned about judicial tyrants who ignore the law and push their desires onto the country. Congress must use its Impeachment Power to remove the usurping judges. They serve during “good Behavior” only (Art. III, Sec. 1) and do not have “lifetime appointments”.
Alexander Hamilton addressed judicial usurpations and the judiciary’s “total incapacity to support its usurpations by force” in Federalist No. 81, 8th para:
“…the important constitutional check which the power of instituting impeachments in one part of the legislative body [House], and of determining upon them in the other [Senate], would give to that body Congress] upon the members of the judicial department. This is alone a complete security. There never can be danger that the judges, by a series of deliberate usurpations on the authority of the legislature, would hazard the united resentment of the body intrusted with it [the impeachment power], while this body Congress] was possessed of the means of punishing their presumption by degrading them from their stations…”
Now you know that federal judges can be impeached, convicted & removed from the bench for usurping power. The Rule of Law does not require us to go along with all court decisions. Rather, if the decision is an usurpation, the Rule of Law requires us to spit on the decision and demand that the judges be impeached & removed from the bench.
Sgt. Joe Friday (LAPD Ret)
Posted at 07:52h, 14 November
I’m all for it but – of course – the radical leftist anarchists will try to coopt the new code, feign great indignation, and insist that the code be enforced retroactively to remove conservative justices. I mean. – really – that’s how they operate. The anarchists have already tried to minimize and even ignore court decisions that they didn’t like. That too is how they operate…if they don’t like something, they try to eradicate it.
2 Comments
Dave
Posted at 18:54h, 13 NovemberI am more concerned about judicial tyrants who ignore the law and push their desires onto the country. Congress must use its Impeachment Power to remove the usurping judges. They serve during “good Behavior” only (Art. III, Sec. 1) and do not have “lifetime appointments”.
Alexander Hamilton addressed judicial usurpations and the judiciary’s “total incapacity to support its usurpations by force” in Federalist No. 81, 8th para:
“…the important constitutional check which the power of instituting impeachments in one part of the legislative body [House], and of determining upon them in the other [Senate], would give to that body Congress] upon the members of the judicial department. This is alone a complete security. There never can be danger that the judges, by a series of deliberate usurpations on the authority of the legislature, would hazard the united resentment of the body intrusted with it [the impeachment power], while this body Congress] was possessed of the means of punishing their presumption by degrading them from their stations…”
Now you know that federal judges can be impeached, convicted & removed from the bench for usurping power. The Rule of Law does not require us to go along with all court decisions. Rather, if the decision is an usurpation, the Rule of Law requires us to spit on the decision and demand that the judges be impeached & removed from the bench.
Sgt. Joe Friday (LAPD Ret)
Posted at 07:52h, 14 NovemberI’m all for it but – of course – the radical leftist anarchists will try to coopt the new code, feign great indignation, and insist that the code be enforced retroactively to remove conservative justices. I mean. – really – that’s how they operate. The anarchists have already tried to minimize and even ignore court decisions that they didn’t like. That too is how they operate…if they don’t like something, they try to eradicate it.