Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved.

July 20, 2024

ROE #11 Superintendent Candidate Michael Smith electioneering with public resources –

By John Kraft & Kirk Allen

On January 27, 2018


It has come to our attention that Michael Smith, current Superintendent of Tuscola School District, and Candidate for the Office of Superintendent of Regional Office of Education #11 has been busy using his school district email for electioneering purposes.

Not only has he been using his school district email, but has done so while he was allegedly supposed to be working for the School District as its Superintendent.

The email chain below, obtained by the Edgar County Watchdogs, shows no less than 29 separate incidents of electioneering using public resources from 6 different public bodies.

Examples extracted from the below emails which we consider electioneering, or Prohibited Political Activity include:

  • Has the Republican Party made an endorsement yet?
  • Get sucked into paying $100 for one of their dinners with no guarantee if they are interested in voting for me
  • Questions to ISBE about his qualification for office and candidacy
  • Questions to an attorney about assistance with reviewing candidacy packets
  • Asking to attend board meetings for the purpose of campaigning (introducing himself)
  • Obtaining permission to use a video on campaign page
  • Yard/Campaign signs
  • Endorsements
  • Seeking campaign advice from school attorney
  • and more…

The vast majority of these emails are generated by Smith, while others were generated by other individuals using their own public resources:

  • Michael Smith – Tuscola CUSD
  • Norm Tracy – Villa Grove CUSD
  • Kendra Rogers – Eastern Illinois Area Special Education
  • Michele Lindenmeyer – Stewardson-Strasburg CUSD
  • Ted Walk – Sullivan CUSD
  • Shiela Greenwood – Bement CUSD

Each and every one of the above individuals should be standing in front of their respective Ethics Commissions answering for their Prohibited Political Activity. They should also be answering to the State Board of Elections on a complaint. This same type of activity happened during the past election with campaigning in favor of a tax referendum in Effingham County. This has to stop. It violates state law, and it provides an unfair advantage.

And although not a public servant, but a contractor:

  • Randy Etnire – from The Upchurch Group, which we believe contracts with the District, discussing the election while asking about payment on an invoice, and saying he would put a candidate sign in his yard

As far as the public email usage, all of it could be considered electioneering according to the State Ethics Act [5 ILCS 430] and is defined as “Campaign for Elective Office” or attempting to influence (campaign for or against) a candidate for office or influence a referendum: Prohibited Political Activity.

We suspect this is only the tip of this iceberg; If he so willingly campaigned for elective office using public resources (email), what else is he doing that we have not found out yet? Did he or his campaign collect signatures at the school when school was in session? Has he used his current position to mass email everyone in his district about his candidacy (since it would be easy for him to have access to their email addresses)? Does he discuss the election while he is getting paid by the district? We will try and answer those questions in the near future.

This just happens to be the same Superintendent that the Tuscola Teachers Association filed a complaint against for harassment and unprofessional conduct last year.

[documentcloud url=”” responsive=true]



Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print


  • J. Madison
    Posted at 11:12h, 27 January Reply

    This information alone should sink this guy. What else is he doing on the taxpayers dime??

  • Looking at it Objectively
    Posted at 19:08h, 27 January Reply

    What a dumbass. And, what kind of dumbass(es) allow themselves to get sucked into it. Of course, “dumbass” may be too generous. It may, instead, be a simple case of outright arrogance on the part of all.

  • Mr. Kotter
    Posted at 12:37h, 29 January Reply

    WDs: What DOES the State Board of Elections have to say about this ?

Post A Comment