Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved.

April 20, 2024

AG sides with Atlanta Library on open meetings complaint – ruling could be problematic for Bill Thomas

By John Kraft & Kirk Allen

On September 28, 2017


After the Atlanta Library District’s August 10, 2017 public meeting, I filed a Request for Review with the Illinois Attorney General’s Public Access Counselor alleging the board violated the open meetings act by not publicly reciting the issue they were about to vote on, prior to the vote.

In the library’s response to the PAC, they claimed it was not a motion to pay any bills, but rather a motion to accept the Treasurer’s Report. That being the case, the title of the document was sufficient, along with copies of the treasurer’s report being made available to attendees.

The problem, is that there were no copies readily available to meeting attendees, at least that we knew of. The board chairman insists there were copies available, but he never informed anyone they were available.

The board was confused on what their action was – as in they did not know if they were voting to pay the bills or if they were simply voting to accept the report.

We will get to the bottom of it because we have requested all the board minutes reflecting votes taken to authorize payments of bills and invoices. We suspect there will be no such minutes.

The Library District Act states that “the Board” has exclusive control of expenditures – not the board treasurer. These words mean that at some time, the board must authorize the paying of expenditures prior to any checks being written.

(75 ILCS 16/30-55.10)
    Sec. 30-55.10. Expenditure of moneys. The board shall have the exclusive control of the expenditure of all moneys collected for the library and deposited to the credit of the appropriate funds.
(Source: P.A. 87-1277.)

It is clearly not the historical norm of this library district. From all appearances and a cursory review of available minutes, there has been nothing more than acceptance of the treasurer’s report.

Additionally, the board claims they have been paying on the lease for nearly a year, when in fact it had only been 8 months, the lease is illegal, there has never been a vote by the board to enter into this lease, and never a vote by the board to pay the rent. From all appearances, Bill Thomas has been doing this all on his own.

If what the board told the PAC is true, that this was only a vote on accepting the report, then the PAC’s determination is correct, however, if what they actually did was approve the payments and the report, then the record needs to be set straight.

49174 o 2e public recital proper lib



Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print


  • James J Pancrazio
    Posted at 16:21h, 28 September

    I suspect that they do not recite the bills and publicly authorize payment. It seems that some of the board members presumed that they were approving.

  • Dave
    Posted at 16:58h, 28 September

    It appears some people are more equal than others.

  • Atlanta Taxpayer
    Posted at 21:15h, 28 September

    Ignorance is bliss! If you take a look at this years agendas alone you will see there is no agenda item to pay bills. If they don’t vote to pay bills then how are they keeping the lights on? You also have to question the due diligence of the AG employee who wrote the opinion. It wouldn’t have taken much effort to figure out the library board is paying their bills illegally. Folks, this is why your wallet has no cash in it! Elected officials and state employees with large salaries and pensions are continually defrauding you! Next question, since it is obvious that the board gives Mr Thomas free reign with the checkbook, Do the checks and the bills match? Are there receipts for all of the checks? Hmm, and the big one. Were there any personal use charges on any of the credit cards? Were the restricted accounts used in accordance to their restrictions? And then we have the Palms Grill black hole! It wouldn’t surprise me if the taxpayers are paying the expenses with their only return on profit being the measly $250 a month rent and you get o e guess where any additional profit is probably going. It’s just laughable! Trustees please resign! You have lost the publics trust and respect.