NAUVOO, IL. (ECWd) –
Requests to the City of Nauvoo for documents associated with the bid process for the City of Nauvoo have gone unanswered, and statements have been made that there were no bids, and thus no contracts associated with them. All of this leads to the question; How is the City ensuring it’s getting the best value for citizens? Are the citizens receiving the best value at a time when finances seem to be so challenging in Nauvoo? These questions require a detailed look at all transactions within the City of Nauvoo.
Among the questionable transactions were purchases from companies owned or managed by City Officials, since these transactions can be a conflict of interest. There is a process defined by State law, and managed by the County, that is intended to limit the effect these dealings can have. A “Statement of Economic Interest” is required from each public official, and must be updated each year. These documents are available for review by the public. Those filed with the Illinois Secretary of State can be reviewed online, but those filed with Hancock County must be individually requested, and the individual whose form is reviewed is notified of who requested to view the form (including their name, address, phone number, purpose, and occupation?). These forms have already been requested and received for many City Officials, and the process is underway to receive all of them. This was initially limited to five years, but the issues raised will expand that further.
As a case in point: Mayor John McCarty has filed Statements of Economic Interest with the Hancock County Clerk, the filing of which is required by law. In each of these forms, he has indicated that he has no ownership in any entity that does business with the City of Nauvoo.
The system maintained by the Secretary of State of Illinois for business registration shows that John McCarty is both the Agent, as well as the President of Outlaw Tee’s, Inc.
A review of the City of Nauvoo expense reports received as a result of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, shows that in each of the reviewed years, Outlaw Tee’s has received payment from the City of Nauvoo on invoices submitted by Outlaw Tee’s. (Copies of these invoices have been requested via FOIA request, but have not been received as of 24 April 2017).
Invoices (city expense reports are here: 2014 – 2015 – 2016 – 2017):
· 11/12/2013 $35.00
· 6/10/2014 $270.20
· 7/30/2014 $449.20
· 8/12/2014 $32.60
· 1/30/2015 $1100.00
· 2/27/2015 $3050.00
· 4/30/2015 $470.00
· 8/31/2015 $215.20
· 9/30/2015 $765.00
· 6/14/2016 $199.40
· 10/11/2016 $65.00
· 12/30/2016 $1645.49
The City’s official Public Notice, places the figure for FY 2015 at $9,798. Clearly not all transactions are included in the expense report we received through our FOIA request.
We do not have details on many transactions made through the City’s Hotel Motel Tax Board, since there are at least two accounts used by the board. One which utilizes the City Treasurer (the Tourism Director’s payroll, travel expenses, rent, utilities, etc.) and another which receives funds from individuals, and is used for other expenses not reflected in the City’s check register. (See “Who May Receive Funds for the City?“) Perhaps this helps to account for some of the disagreement. Details of these accounts have been requested, but have not been received to date.
So, even though the Statement of Economic Interest form filed by the Mayor does not disclose it, his business, Outlaw Tee’s does do business with the City. Once all financial documents are reviewed, the level may grow.
What are the penalties for failing to complete this form accurately? The Statement of Economic Interest form specifies that the penalty “shall be a fine not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment in a penal institution other than the penitentiary not to exceed one year, or both fine and imprisonment.” There are at least six instances of this form not being filed correctly, additional review is needed to determine any additional incorrect statements.
Why does this statement matter?
This statement “alerts public officials to their own financial interests and potential areas of conflict.” Further, “Public officials who have a conflict of interest in a decision must disqualify themselves from making that decision or face civil and criminal penalties.” Secondly, “Disclosure…enables the public to judge whether there was a risk of governmental decisions” being “affected by a public official’s financial self-interest or that of supporters or friends.” Since the Mayor does not vote in City Council meetings (but may be called upon to vote in case of a tie), it is likely there will be the claim that he did not “make” any decisions relating to his business. That does not relieve his responsibility to eliminate even the potential for conflict of interest from those he associates with in City government and to complete statements filed with the County accurately and truthfully.
If this were the extent of the issue, there would simply be consequences determined by a judge, and a commitment to complete the forms more truthfully in the future. But the Statement of Economic Interest leads to areas where City Officials may receive benefit from services provided on their behalf by other public bodies, or the use of public funds to enhance their business dealings. This has required a broader look at what services the City provides to promote, service or support all activities where public officials receive benefit. This has resulted in several additional requests for information to the City of Nauvoo. We recently met with investigators from the Illinois State Police.
First, we have to thank the Illinois State Police Investigators of Zone 4 for the time (over two hours to review all the material) they gave us. They listened, showed concern, provided insight, and were very helpful. They have a tough job, dealing with a lot of difficult situations. They were great.
I received a call on 2 May 2017 from the State’s Attorney in Hancock County, Jason Pohren. When he called, he had the two Illinois State Police Investigators in his office, and was calling to give me an update. A great courtesy.
As he informed me, Mr. Pohren previously was employed by the City of Nauvoo, both as a part-time police officer, and then as a Training Officer. This, coupled with the fact that, in that capacity, if a crime did in fact occur, he stated that he “could have been a witness to a crime” (not knowingly I am absolutely confident), which would mean he would not be the person to investigate this issue due to the potential conflict of interest.
He encouraged us, that if we had someone at Lisa Madigan’s (the Illinois Attorney General’s) office, I should call them. So, on Tuesday I called David Navarro, the Chief of Public Integrity Unit of the Illinois Attorney General’s Office. It was an informative call, and he assured me that Mr. Pohren knows the process to follow to refer a case that may have a conflict, to his office, and seemed surprised that he had not done so. He has done so in the past. We encourage the State’s Attorney to do so.
Information contained within this article provided by, and used with permission of, local Nauvoo Watchdog: openNAUVOO.org
Mayor McCarthy was contacted through his email address and asked for comment. He has not replied as of publication.
Ed PencePosted at 18:11h, 10 May
Maybe the Nauvoo Mayor and La Harpe can share a cell in prison.
Tony BaloneyPosted at 19:11h, 10 May
It’s not like anyone is trying to hide it!
John McCarty was elected Mayor in April, 2005. John is a native of Nauvoo and has lived in Nauvoo all of his life.
John has owned and operated Outlaw Tee’s, a shirt and sign company, for the last 24 years.
John worked in the Nauvoo Blue Cheese factory and in construction prior to that.
Nauvoo City Council for six years
Nauvoo Planning Committee for two years
Board Member of Hancock County Red Cross for three years
Served on the Nauvoo Grape Festival Board for 25 years
Member of the Nauvoo Chamber of Commerce for 15 years
Joseph SmithPosted at 17:52h, 12 May
Robert Wright Editor of opennauvoo and contributor to this article is a man on a witch hunt. A buffoon trying to make a name for himself by taking down people who have dedicated there life to there town.
He wants to get rid of current leadership because they won’t zone the town the way “he” wants it. He stands to gain financially (quite a bit) if this happens.
Like old saying goes…. Consider the source
jmkraftPosted at 17:55h, 12 May
Nice name-calling, however, you haven’t pointed out any inaccuracy contained within the article.
Like the old saying goes, consider the strength of the argument.
Joseph SmithPosted at 18:05h, 12 May
Define who owns a Corp. Legally one man is not the owner just a majority shareholder. That is the sole purpose of being incorporated.
Interesting Robert that you do not contradict the reason for this is your financial gain.
jmkraftPosted at 18:10h, 12 May
Please read up on the definitions provided in state law pertaining to percentages owned of corporations and doing business with that corp. while you own more than 7 1/2 percent of it. Also, please provide proof of “financial gain” (greater than any other land owner if that is what he is) before tendering any more comments with that claim in them.
Joseph SmithPosted at 18:17h, 12 May
No he is not a landowner. But a middle man to put visitors in people’s homes all summer and keep a % of profits from doing so.
His idea to do away with zoning allowing this happen was shot down by the city council and mayor, so now he is on a witch hunt.
Trying to ruin people’s reputations, the very same people who have spent there entire life helping their town for financial gain.
The truth will come out, that the city is hiding nothing. He will have no credibility, sad for a man who runs a business himself.
openNAUVOOPosted at 00:26h, 14 May
This is typical of the responses we’ve been getting. Rather than debate the real issue, change the subject, point at the person trying to get the facts into the public’s hands.
As far as financial gain and zoning, not a word has been said about “zoning”. That could make a good article for the future.
This case is with the Mayor, failing to truthfully complete a statement required by law. It is now in the hands of the State Police and State’s Attorney.
openNAUVOOPosted at 00:36h, 14 May
Trying to deflect from the real point here will not work.
My purpose is not financial gain. My purpose is to bring openness to our City Government, and to hold public officials accountable with how they spend our money.
We have not been able to get the City of Nauvoo to provide one, single bid they have solicited (we’ve asked)). And then, we find that one of the vendor’s being used is owned by the Mayor himself, and…no bids there either.
At least make an attempt to ensure the citizens are getting the best price.
Your attack implies that you do not value integrity in our public officials, that their behavior does not matter. When you don’t like where things are leading, attack the messenger.
openNAUVOOPosted at 10:13h, 14 May
For specific background on openNAUVOO’s efforts and what forced them to get involved, read the article “Why Are You Doing This?” (at http://opennauvoo.org/wordpress/why-are-you-doing-this/), Particularly the section, “Fighting a Bad Idea”