Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved.

March 18, 2024

Conflict of Interest – Capital Development Board (New High School funds) –

By John Kraft & Kirk Allen

On February 13, 2013

EDGAR CO. (ECWd) –

While preparing several emails to send off today, I ran across the Illinois Procurement Code. This is the code the Capital Development Board, where the money for the new High School comes from, uses to determine conflicts of interest, among other things.

It is unfortunate that we have to go through so many different levels and state agencies in order to obtain answers to obvious conflicts – then we have to wonder who will take the stand to make sure these issues are dealt with.

The procurement code spells out what is considered a conflict, and in clear language not easily misunderstood.

Definition

Elective status; the holding of elective office of the State of Illinois, the government of the United States, any unit of local government authorized by the Constitution of the State of Illinois or the statutes of the State of Illinois currently or in the previous 3 years.

Just so everyone is clear on this point: Mr. Patrick DOES hold an elective office of a unit of local government authorized by the Constitution of the State of Illinois.

 The Prohibition

(30 ILCS 500/50-13)
    Sec. 50-13. Conflicts of interest.
    (a) Prohibition. It is unlawful for any person holding an elective office in this State, holding a seat in the General Assembly, or appointed to or employed in any of the offices or agencies of State government and who receives compensation for such employment in excess of 60% of the salary of the Governor of the State of Illinois, or who is an officer or employee of the Capital Development Board or the Illinois Toll Highway Authority, or who is the spouse or minor child of any such person to have or acquire any contract, or any direct pecuniary interest in any contract therein, whether for stationery, printing, paper, or any services, materials, or supplies, that will be wholly or partially satisfied by the payment of funds appropriated by the General Assembly of the State of Illinois or in any contract of the Capital Development Board or the Illinois Toll Highway Authority.

In reading this paragraph, it is clear the legislative intent – That no person holding an elective office, anywhere in the State of Illinois, can have any direct pecuniary interest in any contract paid wholly or partially with any contract of the Capital Development Board, which in turn receives its funds through General Assembly appropriations.

To better understand it, you should look at the use of commas, and their use is consistant with a type of punctuation called a “listing comma”. Take away the commas, and you get a listing of 5 different groups of people who cannot contract or sell materials to these projects:

1.   Those people holding an elective office in this State

2.    Those people holding a seat in the General Assembly

 3.   Those people   appointed to or employed in any of the offices or agencies of State government and who receives compensation for such employment in excess of 60% of the salary of the Governor of the State of Illinois

4.       an officer or employee of the Capital Development Board or the Illinois Toll Highway Authority

5.       the spouse or minor child of any such person

I believe the 1st group directly reflects the situation that Chris Patrick is in when it comes to selling materials or supplies to any contractor for use on the new high school construction project.

We’ll have to wait and see how this project and potential conflict plays out…

————————————–

In another note from the Capitol Development Board, they sent the following email to organizations involved in current construction projects. I do not know what impact this will have on the construction time-line, if any:

From: CDB.Grants <[email protected]>
Date: February 11, 2013, 1:51:09 PM CST
Subject: School Construction Payments

The Capital Development Board (CDB) is in receipt of a School Construction payment request from your school district and at this time the payment cannot be processed until bonds are sold. The CDB has all pending payments ready to be sent to the comptroller as soon as funding is received and understands the hardship this is causing you.  The administration decided to delay the sale of $500 million dollars of general obligation bonds due to the “unsettled” bond market, which occurred after the state’s credit rating was downgraded.  John Sinsheimer, the director of capital markets for Gov. Pat Quinn’s budget office stated, “What they [banks] had indicated was the market had become a bit unsettled as a result of the action of the rating agencies over the last couple of weeks. We felt it was prudent to pull the bonds back.”  School Construction payments are funded through the School Construction Bond Fund.  The February bond sale was going to pay the pending School Construction payments, therefore, grant recipients will have to wait for payments until the next bond sale.  The next bond sale is expected to occur in late March or early April based on the information CDB has received. 

 

NewHSandCDB

SHARE THIS

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

RELATED

5 Comments
  • sandy
    Posted at 12:08h, 13 February

    How much has the school district used up from the first payment?? With the knowledge we have about not receiving the next payment until such time as bonds are sold I believe it would be prudent to wait until the next payment comes in before proceeding any further with the project. It may not be here for another five or six months or more. That and the fact that Chris still is in conflict with the supplies to be furnished. Mr. Isaf needs to get off his a____ and do something to get Chris off any position that anything to do with construction at the airport, pay that money back that, and no profit of any kind from county hiway construction. If there is to be a bid process for concrete to be supplied for any work in Edgar County then don’t award it to any business that Chris is involved with. There are other concrete companies in the area that would appreciate the business.

    • Citizen
      Posted at 08:49h, 12 March

      Please sandy, enlighten the readers as to what other concrete suppliers in the area can cost-effectively deliver concrete to projects in the Paris area? I think if you talk to any of the construction companies in town they will tell you that it is not realistic or cost-effective to order concrete from the concrete companys in Terre Haute, Charleston, or Danville.

      That being said, Chris Patrick needs to either resign from the County Board Chairman position, resign completely from the County Board, OR divest himself of his ownership in the Ready-Mix plant before his arrogance jeopardizes projects in this community.

      • jmkraft
        Posted at 13:35h, 12 March

        Cost effectiveness is not a factor when a conflict of interest is known to exist, or has the potential to exist.

        If he wasn’t on the board there would be no conflict.

  • Me
    Posted at 12:14h, 13 February

    I’m no lawyer or literary specialist, but the thing that sticks out to me in the above statute is the double qualification required for the mentioned conflict. The statute starts off listing the positions that one most hold to create a conflict, that is obvious. But the word “AND” sets a second requirement which is “who receives compensation for such employment in excess of 60% of the salary of the Governor of the State of Illinois”. I may be wrong here, but I doubt that the County Board Chairman’s salary is 60 percent of the Governors. If that’s the case, we have a lot bigger problem that no one’s addressed.

    • jmkraft
      Posted at 12:35h, 13 February

      I further clarified it by adding the use of “listing commas”. The double qualification should (in my opinion) only be used for “those appointed to or employed in any of the offices or agencies of State government” as the double qual. is within the same set of commas.

$